Comments on: Rel=“nofollow” Exploitations?

By: wwe wallpapers

wwe wallpapers — Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:16:47 +0000

Pretty section of content. I just stumbled upon your site and in accession capital to assert that I acquire in fact enjoyed account your blog posts. Anyway I’ll be subscribing to your feeds and even I achievement you access consistently quickly.

By: Interesting Stories

Interesting Stories — Thu, 05 May 2011 12:39:34 +0000

The ideas you provided here are very valuable. It had been such an entertaining surprise to get that awaiting me after i woke up today. They are usually to the point and straightforward to grasp. Warm regards for the useful ideas you have shared here.

By: Backlink Tips

Backlink Tips — Sat, 19 Mar 2011 15:10:05 +0000

Thanks for the reference, a friend and I are working on a project and this information is really helpful. Thanks for the post.

By: john

john — Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:56:49 +0000

does anybody know the date seonetlinks is coming out? i heard it’s an amazing way to generate tons of traffic

By: Jeff

Jeff — Thu, 11 Nov 2010 23:46:04 +0000

I am going to comment on a couple of blogs to see if SEO analytics will show them as a follow link..

By: Kieron Hughes

Kieron Hughes — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:39:52 +0000

Hi SCRE,

Best practice is to use the double quotes, so:

rel=”nofollow”

Although I do believe it will work without.

By: SCRE

SCRE — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:08:27 +0000

Should the attribute be used with or without quotes, or does it not matter?

rel=follow or rel=”follow”

I have see blog posts using both.

And is it valid in any case? It is not listed here:

http://www.w3schools.com/TAGS/att_a_rel.asp

By: John Wood

John Wood — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:53:56 +0000

Drat! did not expect forum to convert code into a link!

‘mysite.com’ rel=”nofollow”> Widgets, gizmos and thingamabobs

By: John Wood

John Wood — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:50:48 +0000

All interesting, but would Google for instance note the content in the link?

e.g.

If a network site generates text such as “Widgets, gizmos and thingamabobs” would there be a boost to the site ‘mysite’ for those keywords even though pagerank would not be affected.

Since Google tends to uplift sites when lots of people are talking about them on networking sites the anewer would seem to be ‘yes’

By: joyce

joyce — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:30:54 +0000

ya i also think rel=”nofollow” takes precedence. Otherwise spammers could exploit.spammers to use forums and blogs where links tend to be nofollowed is used to get more back links to website.